5
Bugs/Problems
Started by Bill , Jun 15 2008 - 04:30 PM
63 replies to this topic
#16
Posted Jan 03 2010 - 05:40 AM
Keith, could you please add Tommi´s latest night track to the database?
#17
Posted Jan 03 2010 - 09:46 AM
Burnsy865, on Jan 2 2010, 11:12 PM, said:
Go to page 2 and click on the larger photo on the left of the 5 smaller photo's. The photo on the other side will take you to the page to get the hi and lo res add ons. I just tried it and it works OK for me.
Thank you Craig,
works fine
Jerry
#18
Posted Jan 03 2010 - 02:57 PM
Kanzo, on Jan 3 2010, 12:40 PM, said:
Keith, could you please add Tommi´s latest night track to the database?
Thank you both!
#19
Posted Jan 06 2010 - 06:43 PM
Hi Keith and Bill,
I think I've discovered a slight problem with the current version of the SGEM.INI file. After installing the Birmingham Night track, I went into the season manager in GEM and updated my SGEM.INI. Everything seems to work fine as far as GEM/GPL etc. is concerned, but I have a PERL script which I use to create sorted lists of all my lap records from GPLRank. The script uses SGEM.INI as a source for all the track names. Since I updated the file, it's been printing "blank" for some of the names. On checking SGEM.INI I've found that there's a blank data block labelled "[]" in the file between the sections for "[bhmsnite]" and "[blodbath]". I'm sure that block isn't really supposed to be there!
As I say, it's not serious as everything except my script seems to work fine, and I've edited my copy so I don't have the problem any more. But I guess you'll want to tidy up the file.
EDIT: I've just been going through the Track Database adding some votes, and this blank track shows up in the track listings as well! Oops!
Cheers!
I think I've discovered a slight problem with the current version of the SGEM.INI file. After installing the Birmingham Night track, I went into the season manager in GEM and updated my SGEM.INI. Everything seems to work fine as far as GEM/GPL etc. is concerned, but I have a PERL script which I use to create sorted lists of all my lap records from GPLRank. The script uses SGEM.INI as a source for all the track names. Since I updated the file, it's been printing "blank" for some of the names. On checking SGEM.INI I've found that there's a blank data block labelled "[]" in the file between the sections for "[bhmsnite]" and "[blodbath]". I'm sure that block isn't really supposed to be there!
As I say, it's not serious as everything except my script seems to work fine, and I've edited my copy so I don't have the problem any more. But I guess you'll want to tidy up the file.
EDIT: I've just been going through the Track Database adding some votes, and this blank track shows up in the track listings as well! Oops!
Cheers!
Edited by Saiph, Jan 07 2010 - 03:22 PM.
#20
Posted Jan 10 2010 - 05:26 PM
There is probably something wrong with the world record for the Targa marked at the ATDB :
Attached Files
#22
Posted Apr 09 2010 - 11:47 AM
Just noticed a slight problem with the track database. I was trying to search for night tracks by going to the advanced search, and selecting "Night Track" in the "Track Type" box. However, for some reason, Birmingham Superprix Night Circuit doesn't appear. A list of 26 tracks is shown, but could there be others that are missing, apart from Birmingham? Cheers.
#23
Posted Apr 09 2010 - 12:30 PM
Saiph, on Apr 09 2010 - 11:47 AM, said:
Just noticed a slight problem with the track database. I was trying to search for night tracks by going to the advanced search, and selecting "Night Track" in the "Track Type" box. However, for some reason, Birmingham Superprix Night Circuit doesn't appear. A list of 26 tracks is shown, but could there be others that are missing, apart from Birmingham? Cheers.
yes, i have noticed same problem , but with airfield track, it keeps out many considered tracks.
#24
Posted May 02 2010 - 03:22 PM
Nitpicking here.
On the "vote for" page, in "sort options", descending is misspelled. (desending)
Also, there's no option for sorting by overall rating.
On the "vote for" page, in "sort options", descending is misspelled. (desending)
Also, there's no option for sorting by overall rating.
Edited by jgf, May 02 2010 - 03:22 PM.
#25 Dark - guest
Posted Nov 20 2010 - 06:58 AM
Any plans to expand the setup database to allow the upload of GT setups?
#26
Posted Nov 21 2010 - 09:01 PM
[quote name='Saiph' date='09 April 2010 - 12:47 PM' timestamp='1270835263' post='44603']
Just noticed a slight problem with the track database. I was trying to search for night tracks by going to the advanced search, and selecting "Night Track" in the "Track Type" box. However, for some reason, Birmingham Superprix Night Circuit doesn't appear. A list of 26 tracks is shown, but could there be others that are missing, apart from Birmingham? Cheers.
[/quote]
Mistake in track entry, fixed
[quote name='Jhalli' date='09 April 2010 - 01:30 PM' timestamp='1270837842' post='44605']
[quote name='Saiph' date='09 April 2010 - 09:47 PM' timestamp='1270835263' post='44603']
Just noticed a slight problem with the track database. I was trying to search for night tracks by going to the advanced search, and selecting "Night Track" in the "Track Type" box. However, for some reason, Birmingham Superprix Night Circuit doesn't appear. A list of 26 tracks is shown, but could there be others that are missing, apart from Birmingham? Cheers.
[/quote]
yes, i have noticed same problem , but with airfield track, it keeps out many considered tracks.
[/quote]
Example?
[quote name='jgf' date='02 May 2010 - 04:22 PM' timestamp='1272835322' post='45689']
Nitpicking here.
On the "vote for" page, in "sort options", descending is misspelled. (desending)
Also, there's no option for sorting by overall rating.
[/quote]
Fixed and will add that option soon
[quote name='Dark' date='20 November 2010 - 07:58 AM' timestamp='1290257914' post='54598']
Any plans to expand the setup database to allow the upload of GT setups?
[/quote]
Sure we can do that, give me a bit to get it sorted out
Just noticed a slight problem with the track database. I was trying to search for night tracks by going to the advanced search, and selecting "Night Track" in the "Track Type" box. However, for some reason, Birmingham Superprix Night Circuit doesn't appear. A list of 26 tracks is shown, but could there be others that are missing, apart from Birmingham? Cheers.
[/quote]
Mistake in track entry, fixed
[quote name='Jhalli' date='09 April 2010 - 01:30 PM' timestamp='1270837842' post='44605']
[quote name='Saiph' date='09 April 2010 - 09:47 PM' timestamp='1270835263' post='44603']
Just noticed a slight problem with the track database. I was trying to search for night tracks by going to the advanced search, and selecting "Night Track" in the "Track Type" box. However, for some reason, Birmingham Superprix Night Circuit doesn't appear. A list of 26 tracks is shown, but could there be others that are missing, apart from Birmingham? Cheers.
[/quote]
yes, i have noticed same problem , but with airfield track, it keeps out many considered tracks.
[/quote]
Example?
[quote name='jgf' date='02 May 2010 - 04:22 PM' timestamp='1272835322' post='45689']
Nitpicking here.
On the "vote for" page, in "sort options", descending is misspelled. (desending)
Also, there's no option for sorting by overall rating.
[/quote]
Fixed and will add that option soon
[quote name='Dark' date='20 November 2010 - 07:58 AM' timestamp='1290257914' post='54598']
Any plans to expand the setup database to allow the upload of GT setups?
[/quote]
Sure we can do that, give me a bit to get it sorted out
#27 Dark - guest
Posted Nov 22 2010 - 08:29 AM
Thanks Bill
I'll start collecting GT setups
I'll start collecting GT setups
#28
Posted Dec 26 2011 - 02:02 AM
The link for Golita (Goleta on the cover) is dead:
"Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at pages.sbcglobal.net."
"Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at pages.sbcglobal.net."
#29
Posted Dec 29 2011 - 07:10 PM
Here you go. Goleta/Hope Ranch.
Attached Files
#30
Posted Dec 29 2011 - 07:11 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users