265 replies to this topic

[Bob Simpson]

ntoxcated, on Sep 5 2006, 02:24 PM, said:

Setups will be very useful - I have a standard setup saved at Adelaide (first track in my list) that I copy to every new track then just tweak the gears.  Having proper setups per track would be far better

I'm not sure what you're thinking, but the having the World Records showing and the setups is unrelated.  

There was/is a site that had 67FD, F2 etc WRs and the setups were availalbe there too - see https://gplrank.schue...de/jcindex.html  That kind of site ror all the mods would be great, but perhaps too much work.

Or are you talking about the 65s setups compilation in Keith's signature?

Edited by Bob Simpson, Sep 05 2006 - 07:03 PM.

[dangermouse]

Bob Simpson, on Sep 6 2006, 02:02 AM, said:

Or are you talking about the 65s setups compilation in Keith's signature?

All mod setups will be available if people upload them

[ntoxcated]

Bob Simpson, on Sep 6 2006, 01:02 PM, said:

I'm not sure what you're thinking, but the having the World Records showing and the setups is unrelated.

I've obviously got the completely wrong end of the stick!

dangermouse, on Sep 6 2006, 03:54 AM, said:

Hopefully we'll be able to get the other project working soon - just look at the greyed out button

The only greyed out button I could find at the track database was the setups button so I figured that was the other project Keith was referring to.  

In my defense, it was very early here when I read it  

[dangermouse]

ntoxcated, on Sep 6 2006, 07:50 AM, said:

I've obviously got the completely wrong end of the stick!


The only greyed out button I could find at the track database was the setups button so I figured that was the other project Keith was referring to.  

In my defense, it was very early here when I read it  

No you didn't, it was the one I was referring to.

[ntoxcated]

Cheers DM    I'm glad I wasn't being a bit of a thicky!

[Bob Simpson]

ntoxcated, on Sep 6 2006, 02:58 AM, said:

Cheers DM    I'm glad I wasn't being a bit of a thicky!

Sorry ntoxcated.  I'm the thicky.  All I had to do was look at what dangermouse was referring to.

That'll be a great feature to be able to find setups that way!  Great idea Keith!

[dangermouse]

Bob Simpson, on Sep 6 2006, 12:22 PM, said:

That'll be a great feature to be able to find setups that way!  Great idea Keith!

Great idea, Bill.  

[Stefan Roess]

Thx Keith and all involved for your hard work on the alternative database  

And thx Maik for GPLScreenshots!  

Btw, Keith if you need any help doing screens and put them together in one picture for each track just PM me  

[pirenzo]

Dunno if this has already been pointed out, but currently Nurbnite has a graphics score of 318%, quite how this is possible I don't know...

And I still think that a future development of the ratings system ought to exclude tracks with fewer than say 10 or 15 votes.

[Bill]

Looking into that, thx

[monty]

A couple of quick questions about the Track DB.

1.  Is it me, or does the track DB not work correctly when using browsers such as Safari (on Mac OS X)?


2.  On Magnus' track DB website it used to be possible to formulate a link like:

https://trackdb.d2g.c...s.asp?D=Mosport

and get a page with just Mosport.   Is there a way to achieve this with this site?  I'd like to modify our League's schedule page to link to information for each track used in a particular season (so as to ensure everybody downloads the correct version of the track...)


Thanks for this great resource!

[dangermouse]

Monty,

1. Don't know. Don't have a Mac and you're the 1st person to comment on that. Let's see if someone comes along and comments.

2. Yes. https://gpltd.bcsims....p?track=mosport
   (Where mosport = track folder name    )

[monty]

dangermouse, on Dec 1 2006, 12:58 AM, said:

2. Yes. https://gpltd.bcsims....p?track=mosport
   (Where mosport = track folder name    )

Thanks!  Exactly what I was looking for

[Fast Tommi]

pirenzo, on Nov 25 2006, 09:05 AM, said:

currently Nurbnite has a graphics score of 318%, quite how this is possible I don't know...

everything is a bit bigger at the ring         


tommi  

[dangermouse]

monty, on Dec 1 2006, 07:52 AM, said:

1.  Is it me, or does the track DB not work correctly when using browsers such as Safari (on Mac OS X)?

Have you tried firefox v2 on the Mac OS X?





EDIT: Have just received info that it's not just you as someone else tried safari and encountered probs but he uses firefox primarily so hadn't noticed a problem.

Edited by dangermouse, Dec 01 2006 - 07:59 PM.